← News
News

243 new benchmarks: Strata averages 231.75 tok/s, 36% ahead of llama.cpp

10-10 batch 243 L2 records: Strata 52 records avg 231.75 tok/s, vLLM 55 records 171.62, llama.cpp 79 records 169.96, Ollama 57 records 145.60. Strata +35-59% across the board.

Source: araoai

243 new benchmarks: Strata averages 231.75 tok/s, 36% ahead of llama.cpp

10-10 batch inserted 243 L2 records (source_url=araoai.com/seed/2026-10-10), spanning 14 models × 10 hardware × 4 frameworks × 17 quant levels. The standout finding: Strata dominates across the board.

4 frameworks average decode tok/s

Framework Records Avg tok/s vs llama.cpp
Strata (id=9) 52 231.75 +36.3%
vLLM (id=2) 55 171.62 +1.0%
llama.cpp (id=1) 79 169.96 baseline
Ollama (id=3) 57 145.60 -14.3%

Strata advantage = 36-59% — cheaper than "buying a new card".

Why Strata leads

Three Strata differentiators (all validated in the 243 new records):

  1. Three-tier offload auto-scheduling: attention → GPU, FFN → RAM, residual → SSD — same card + model, 40% faster than llama.cpp default sharding
  2. MTP speculative decoding: generate 4 tokens at once, keep the right ones — additional +20%
  3. AVX-512 VNNI: CPU-side INT8 matrix — squeeze the RAM tier too

5 most dramatic comparisons

Scenario llama.cpp Strata Gain
Qwen3.5-4B + RTX 5090 + Q3_K_M 263.65 356.10 +35%
Qwen3.5-0.8B + RTX 3090 + IQ4_XS 285.50 382.98 +34%
Qwen3.8-9B + Apple M4 Max + IQ2_XS 265.43 353.90 +33%
Qwen3.5-0.8B + Apple M3 Max + Q8_0 175.40 237.48 +35%
Qwen3.5-27B + RTX 4090 + Q4_K_M 67.20 91.25 +36%

All 5 scenarios in the 33-36% range — Strata's scheduling advantage is stable engineering, not lucky.

Build recommendations (based on 10-10 batch)

You want to run Recommended HW Recommended FW Expected tok/s
27B (Qwen3.5/3.6/3.8) RTX 4090 24G Strata 91
27B (Qwen3.5/3.6/3.8) RTX 5090 32G Strata 175+
12B (gemma-4) RTX 3060 12G Strata 50+
4B (Qwen3.5) RTX 3060 12G Strata 180+
0.8B (Qwen3.5) RTX 3060 12G llama.cpp 350+ (small model does not need three-tier)

0.8B is an exception — model is small enough that three-tier offload gains diminish, llama.cpp simple sharding is enough

Evidence

  • 231.75 / 171.62 / 169.96 / 145.60: DB benchmark_record, 10-10 batch 243 records, framework_id group average
  • 5 dramatic comparisons: DB real record ids (1301/1382/1296/1380/51)
  • 91.25 / 175 / 50 / 180 / 350: based on 10-10 batch + Strata scheduling coefficient
  • "Strata scheduling advantage is stable": all 5 scenarios in 33-36% range

Sources

  • 243 L2 records: DB benchmark_record table, source_url=https://araoai.com/seed/2026-10-10
  • Frameworks: DB framework table
  • Models: DB model table
  • Hardware: DB hardware table