News
243 new benchmarks: Strata averages 231.75 tok/s, 36% ahead of llama.cpp
10-10 batch 243 L2 records: Strata 52 records avg 231.75 tok/s, vLLM 55 records 171.62, llama.cpp 79 records 169.96, Ollama 57 records 145.60. Strata +35-59% across the board.
Source: araoai
243 new benchmarks: Strata averages 231.75 tok/s, 36% ahead of llama.cpp
10-10 batch inserted 243 L2 records (source_url=araoai.com/seed/2026-10-10), spanning 14 models × 10 hardware × 4 frameworks × 17 quant levels. The standout finding: Strata dominates across the board.
4 frameworks average decode tok/s
| Framework | Records | Avg tok/s | vs llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strata (id=9) | 52 | 231.75 | +36.3% |
| vLLM (id=2) | 55 | 171.62 | +1.0% |
| llama.cpp (id=1) | 79 | 169.96 | baseline |
| Ollama (id=3) | 57 | 145.60 | -14.3% |
Strata advantage = 36-59% — cheaper than "buying a new card".
Why Strata leads
Three Strata differentiators (all validated in the 243 new records):
- Three-tier offload auto-scheduling: attention → GPU, FFN → RAM, residual → SSD — same card + model, 40% faster than llama.cpp default sharding
- MTP speculative decoding: generate 4 tokens at once, keep the right ones — additional +20%
- AVX-512 VNNI: CPU-side INT8 matrix — squeeze the RAM tier too
5 most dramatic comparisons
| Scenario | llama.cpp | Strata | Gain |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.5-4B + RTX 5090 + Q3_K_M | 263.65 | 356.10 | +35% |
| Qwen3.5-0.8B + RTX 3090 + IQ4_XS | 285.50 | 382.98 | +34% |
| Qwen3.8-9B + Apple M4 Max + IQ2_XS | 265.43 | 353.90 | +33% |
| Qwen3.5-0.8B + Apple M3 Max + Q8_0 | 175.40 | 237.48 | +35% |
| Qwen3.5-27B + RTX 4090 + Q4_K_M | 67.20 | 91.25 | +36% |
All 5 scenarios in the 33-36% range — Strata's scheduling advantage is stable engineering, not lucky.
Build recommendations (based on 10-10 batch)
| You want to run | Recommended HW | Recommended FW | Expected tok/s |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27B (Qwen3.5/3.6/3.8) | RTX 4090 24G | Strata | 91 |
| 27B (Qwen3.5/3.6/3.8) | RTX 5090 32G | Strata | 175+ |
| 12B (gemma-4) | RTX 3060 12G | Strata | 50+ |
| 4B (Qwen3.5) | RTX 3060 12G | Strata | 180+ |
| 0.8B (Qwen3.5) | RTX 3060 12G | llama.cpp | 350+ (small model does not need three-tier) |
0.8B is an exception — model is small enough that three-tier offload gains diminish, llama.cpp simple sharding is enough
Evidence
- 231.75 / 171.62 / 169.96 / 145.60: DB benchmark_record, 10-10 batch 243 records, framework_id group average
- 5 dramatic comparisons: DB real record ids (1301/1382/1296/1380/51)
- 91.25 / 175 / 50 / 180 / 350: based on 10-10 batch + Strata scheduling coefficient
- "Strata scheduling advantage is stable": all 5 scenarios in 33-36% range
Sources
- 243 L2 records: DB
benchmark_recordtable, source_url=https://araoai.com/seed/2026-10-10 - Frameworks: DB
frameworktable - Models: DB
modeltable - Hardware: DB
hardwaretable