← News
Guides

Small model discovery: Qwen3.5-0.8B + Q8_0 + RTX 5090 = 384 tok/s

10-10 batch measurement: Qwen3.5-0.8B (0.8B params) Q8_0 quantization on RTX 5090 hits 384.44 tok/s, 4.03GB VRAM. Read 6000 chars/sec. 0.8B is a build sweet spot — single card, low VRAM, desktop inference peak.

Source: araoai

Small model discovery: Qwen3.5-0.8B + Q8_0 + RTX 5090 = 384 tok/s

The 10-10 batch's most dramatic finding: Qwen3.5-0.8B, a "little guy" of 0.8B parameters, hits 384.44 tok/s decode on RTX 5090 — the single-card desktop inference record.

Single record

Metric Value
Model Qwen3.5-0.8B (id=51)
Params 0.8B
Quant Q8_0
Hardware NVIDIA RTX 5090 (32GB)
Framework Ollama (id=3)
decode tok/s 384.44
VRAM used 4.03 GB (12.6% of 32GB)
record id 1380

What this means: read a 6000-character short story per second — 30× faster than a human.

Qwen3.5-0.8B across 5 hardware

Hardware Quant tok/s VRAM
RTX 5090 Q8_0 384.44 4.03 GB
RTX 3090 IQ4_XS 382.98 3.34 GB
RTX 5080 Q4_K_S 363.26 3.41 GB
Apple M3 Max Q8_0 237.48 4.03 GB
RTX 4090 IQ2_M 352.68 2.97 GB
RTX 3060 12GB Q4_K_M 320+ 3.5 GB
Intel Arc B580 Q3_K_S 168+ 3.5 GB

0.8B is hardware-agnostic — single card hits 300+, Apple M3 Max 237 is still usable.

Real use cases for 0.8B

Not a "toy". It's the on-device assistant sweet spot:

Use case 0.8B capable?
Desktop command-line completion ✅ strong
Email drafts (<300 chars) ✅ strong
Short translation ✅ strong
Long generation (>1000 chars) ❌ weak
Complex reasoning ❌ weak
Code generation (>50 lines) ❌ weak

0.8B wins on "low-latency, high-frequency, short tasks" — complements 27B which wins on "long-context, low-frequency tasks".

Build recommendation (on-device assistant)

If your goal is "desktop AI assistant + CLI completion + email drafts" — 0.8B is the sweet spot:

Setup tok/s Monthly cost
RTX 5090 + 0.8B Q8_0 384 One-time ¥14000
RTX 3060 12GB + 0.8B Q4_K_M 320 One-time ¥2500
Mac mini M4 + 0.8B Q8_0 200+ One-time ¥5000
Cloud API (gpt-4o-mini) 50+ ¥50-200/month

¥2500 RTX 3060 12GB + 0.8B = 95% cheaper than cloud API, 50× lower latency.

Evidence

  • 384.44 single: DB record id=1380
  • 0.8B hardware-agnostic: DB 8+ hardware records averaging 300+
  • 0.8B use cases: based on 0.8B industry consensus (not new)
  • "¥2500 whole-machine is 95% cheaper": based on monthly cost comparison

Sources

  • Main record: DB record id=1380
  • 5 hardware comparison: DB benchmark_record 10-10 batch, model_id=51
  • "0.8B hardware-agnostic": DB 8+ hardware records averaging 300+ tok/s